Saturday, November 6, 2010

The Conversion Experience



The conversion experience is an important aspect of belief systems. Due to one cataclysmic event, a person "sees the light" and is inalterably changed. As a rule, this epiphanic moment happens suddenly, converting the individual from a suffering, despairing human being into someone who has found peace and salvation. It is a seemingly magical experience that appears to happen without rhyme or reason.

Many of my patients have talked about their earlier conversions. Things must be going badly — this is the sine qua nonfor the conversion experience. Further, the difficulties must have endured for some time before the defense system begins to crumble. The individual's current situation, compounded with past trauma, becomes more than the person can handle. Suddenly there is breakdown and conversion.

I recall how one patient put it: "I was broke, divorced and alone for some time. One day, sitting in the park alone at dusk, I felt something grab me and I screamed out all to myself, 'I’ve been saved!' What I discovered later in therapy was that I had been saved from a feeling that I was never saved, that my parents let me drown in my misery without so much as batting an eye. They did nothing to help me, turned me out at the age of 15 because I didn't behave, and let me flounder in life through drugs and alcohol without once reaching out to help.”

Naked before this neglect, unloved, alone, she fled into the arms of the mystical, where she no longer felt alone or unloved. Now that she had been saved, she no longer had to feel that there was no one to save her from her childhood hell. She now had renewed hope, the same hope she had lost very early in her life. This was the essence of her conversion; she had converted hopelessness into hope.

Therein lies the paradigm for the conversion experience. I call it a primal crisis. It usually occurs to people when they are in enormous pain or on the brink of it. It is really the snapping point and it occurs when the person can no longer defend. There's nothing else left for her to do but to be "saved" by God.

Very often, when my patients are on the verge of tremendous feelings, particularly the feelings that predate verbal abilities, they begin to shake and tremble enormously; they thrash and writhe as the force of the pain almost lifts them off the ground. One patient, while convulsing violently, screamed out that she felt a "force" shaking her. Finally she cried, "I’ve been saved, I’ve been saved!"

This occurred during a personal crisis, a period of utmost despair and hopelessness. For weeks she had been seriously contemplating suicide. Finally, her conversion experience told why she was suffering so much. By being "born again," she had been "saved" — saved from the discovery that she had absolutely no one in her life, not now, not ever. Her "rebirth" spared her the profound hopelessness that comes with the realization that she was utterly alone in an indifferent universe, that no one loved her.

Why do people tremble and shake while undergoing "religious conversion?” It's really a very short leap from the feeling fueling these convulsions to sensing a new, magical, benevolent force that controls one's destiny. It is childhood pain converted to a belief in childhood magic, the belief that anything is now possible. The form doesn't matter: Jesus, Buddha, Allah, pyramid power, communication with an omniscient seer from centuries past. One is now in another realm, another universe.

What we see in the conversion experience is how pliable feelings are; how easily they are turned into ideas and how those ideas have the strength of feeling. This process is not as freakish as one might imagine, since it aids in survival.

36 comments:

  1. Art

    So… cognitive therapies "saves" lives... “saving” lives to be preserved in their illness... a psychological manifestation of physiologically content... a manifestation retention on the earth as flat as a pancake until the day mankind will destroy itself.

    Frank

    ReplyDelete
  2. Art,

    Thank you very much for posting this.
    You are ingenious. It could be seen because you are developing such complex and contemplate theory based on the work for more than 40 years. You are helping people. Your books helped me to understand life, to get from life something I really want and need, and to have state about a lot in my life based on truth and honesty and little bit simplicity, but not stupidity and naivety.
    To understand your books we need natural intelligency, empathy, and to be honest toward truth.
    You are, as I can see from your work, enthusiastic, filantropic, altruistic...
    It is very noble to help people.
    I cant read any more articles from other scientists, who pray to god and still believe in Evolution, who have shallow theories about pieces, yet they are respected more, more than you from larger community. they dont have solutions, or they have instant solutions talking to your mind and lef brain...
    You are one of the greatest.

    I think we need different approach to some sciences and different scientific establishment.

    I wish you all the best

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dr. Janov,

    Very important and strait to the point. I love it.

    It is always the powerless, the underdog, the one who feels worthless, the one who never found its own identity (buried under a mountain of trauma) who surrenders to a pyramid power.

    The idea that we have an identity must be dismissed, because the pattern of trauma is the imprint worthlessness and that we are nothing without God.

    The success of religion is to use this primal experience (coming close to who we really of our disabling pain) as a God send enlightenment, to stay in power.

    Sieglinde

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't think there has ever been before an attempt to explain psychologically the epiphany experience (seeing the light). I see it as a last ditch attempt to hold back on rising pain from the subconscious and only makes sense to anyone having had a re-living experience and integrating it. It becomes so easy to pass it off as supernatural--the real meaning is too unbearable to contemplate--except that to do so actually offers the ultimate relief. It's perhaps possible that Danny Wilson was not the first to go through a full re-living experince, but no-one, it seems, ever talked or wrote about it until 1967.

    It perhaps sounds super arrogant to suggest that all religious, spiritual and supernatural explanations are merely rising feelings that the defense system is compelled to reject, and give an explanation--though absurdly irrational--but not uncommon. It is the common-ness of it, that gives it credence. We now know better, as a result of Primal Theory, but the acceptance of that better-knowing is slow to become acceptable.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Art

    It is amazing that we can be so close to our feelings… yet they are led away to something completely different. It really shows that the pain at the moment is overwhelming ... so overwhelming that the process of life… virtually wiping out itself. Today ... with the good memory of that primal therapy exists it can be said that there is a fundamental human abuse that happens in our churches ... but who dares to stand up for the liberation as the belief in God means… against a tremendous pain? Madness around the world is frightening. I can still imagine that there are ways to capture this suffering before ending up in a conviction of god.

    Frank

    ReplyDelete
  6. And I guess similarly that goes on to a degree when we come to therapy "Save me Art!" In the 1980s I met a number of people who were pissed that Primal didn't 'save' them in the way expected. Ah well, at least we still have Superman!

    Brian Collecott
    London, UK.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think feeling depressed and in despair is what happens when the world does not make sense and therefore a persons relationship to experience threatens the current ego organisation. A religious experience may help give coherence and meaning by the illusion that a divine caregiver is on your side. This may aid survival only in the sense of restoring social function and a feeling of positivity. But the illusion means the person is more remote from perceiving the world as it is that he was before. In this sense it is a less adaptive state, e.g. it may promote less caution than necessary because you think god is on your side. When it comes to letting go and restoring feeling the belief will be threatened again in a therapeutic context.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Because of a technical difficulty I am not sure that some comments I made yesterday in fact did get to Dr Janov. So here goes again:

    I found this article fascinating and so important , and all writings by Dr Janov on belief systems potentially revolutionary in their cultural consequences.What Janov describes in the first paragraph is exactly what happenned to Bill Wilson, a founder of the Alcoholics Anonymous organisation, while he was in a hospital for the upteenth time due to the consequences of a painful life and alcoholism. All AA people ,though, think that he actually did have an encounter with God, and explaining away his experience would totally undermine that organisation`s foundations. Well, if Science triumphs, that will inevitably happen, all for the good; in the meantime they continue to convert and not drink, and now we know why...

    I have one big question though: what is the difference between this breakdown of defenses leading to conversion, and the breakdown in defenses leading to some liberation with Primal? Is it like with LSD: that the person on the way to converting is too overloaded with ascending Pain , and so shuts down with a conversion and symbolisation?

    Marco

    ReplyDelete
  9. Art,

    It is truly amazing what you write ... quite buff term incredible ... we are caught off guard by our own internal incapacity of "knowledge"... knowledge about the content of pain… which is the consequence of the choice of God as relief from suffering ... we "know" about god but we do not know about primal therapy. What I mean is... the dissemination of information about primal therapy must take off ... to find ways of spreading information. I return to my wish of how... we must get a commercial representation ... limited to information from The Primal Center?

    Frank

    ReplyDelete
  10. Dear Art ,i wonder why on earth the "victims...? of an epiphany in general do function in their lives (profession and school/university career) and some of them crumble in psychic pieces -like
    my diseased friend .
    I remember once driving with him to see his doctor and suddenly he told me "let`s look whether I am God or not" and then he drove right
    on the car before us !!
    A female friend of mine could finish her university studies o n l y with her catholic epiphany conversion otherwise "she would gone crazy..!"
    And why do I -"free -thinker ...forgive my self
    boasting... did it not in life ?
    yours emanuel

    ReplyDelete
  11. Incredible !! It seems this text give me an answer I was looking for a long time to understand how it was possible .... I couldn’t understand what helped me to change so immediately after my two suicide attempts (in 1993) with a week interval the first one from the second one.
    .......”It is really the snapping point and it occurs when the person can no longer defend. There's nothing else left for her to do but to be "saved" by God.....”
    Here I have a little problem because I do not belive in God.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Frank: All I can do is write and think. I leave it to all of you to promote. Art Janov

    ReplyDelete
  13. Marco: I will write more on this soon. AJ

    ReplyDelete
  14. Marco: I could answer but for now I will leave it to the brilliant readers to provide answers. AJ

    ReplyDelete
  15. Brian. I think you will find that most of those people went to mock therapists and thought they were experiencing primal. Not often the case. art janov

    ReplyDelete
  16. Nenad: Well thank you. If my work helps it is all I ask. art janov

    ReplyDelete
  17. Sieglinde: always wonderful comments. art janov

    ReplyDelete
  18. Sabina. that is indeed a small problem. art janov

    ReplyDelete
  19. Marco,

    Not to suggest I'm brilliant, but I'll have a go with your question...

    I think you had it right with the LSD thing (Bad trip from LSD = chemically induced psychotic episode? I think that would be right).

    The individual in a "conversion experience" can't cope (their defences are seriously breaking down) and is getting too close to severe early trauma/s that they are [not yet] able to integrate. This leaves the defence system with no choice but to heavily symbolise (just like in a psychotic episode). The symbolism is ultimately the brains way of dissociating consciousness from the direct experience of the repressed pain. The conversion experience a serious compromise because the individual is forced to become even more divorced from reality, but it can be a necessary 'emergency' compromise so it happens anyway.

    If the subject were in fact able to integrate their pain then they would indeed probably Primal. That's all primal is - approaching pains that you are ready to integrate, and therefore will.

    I would guess that Art would say that conversion experiences are what happens when you 'buck evolution' - that is, confront serious pains before you're ready to.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Hi everybody,

    Religion is legally paranoid, not condemned by society, yet desirable in every almost culture in the world?
    Do I have opponent in this statement?

    Nenad

    ReplyDelete
  21. Nenad: France says it is institutionalized hope. Or as I say, it is socially approved delusion. AJ

    ReplyDelete
  22. May I comment:
    Religion is co-dependency indoctrinated - for traumatized people with no identity.
    Another form of delusional disorder ICD 10: F22.0 or 297.1
    Sieglinde

    ReplyDelete
  23. Don't trust Janov? My cousin Marion had wild suspicions until she saw Janov talking on a TV show. She said "You know what, Richard? He was actually sooo cool".
    She admired his ability to speak in such a normal and effortless way. Marion is always very interested in personalities. She still shows little interest in life-saving information (because I try to force the information down her throat).
    During the TV show, her previous thoughts of "freaky cult leader" were instantly destroyed. Now she listens more to her own feelings (sometimes I wish she wouldn't), instead of all the people who try to convince her that Primal Therapy is crap (none of those people have read anything on Primal Therapy).
    Marion is waiting for me to do it first before she makes a decision. that's quite a leap from "freaky cult leader". I think videos have the ability to tap into a person's intuition. That's why I am looking forward to the primal documentary (no hurry) so I can show it to a few special people. I MUST convert them.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Marco

    If and when you start with primal therapy… you will understand the parable between primal therapy ... god and drugs. The pain is what will make you understand the difference...god and drugs provides an instant "gratification" that will not primal therapy.

    Frank

    ReplyDelete
  25. Marco

    Just by daily terns touch feelings... feelings of pain... it will do a difference in the way I look at things… not least my courage changes. Feelings of fear in memory of hopelessness… sort of blurs my daily feelings… feelings of shyness etc… but it also makes coloring sharper. This remembers me of what Art ones said “you don’t need drugs to live… you need drugs because you don’t live.

    Frank

    ReplyDelete
  26. Andrew: Your clear explanation sounds plausible to me, and confirms what I thought. Our good Dr J. backs your explanation, so my confusion is resolved.

    Frank: thank you also for your comments.

    I like what Madame Janov has to say about religion as "institutionlised hope", or "socially approved delusion" as Janov says (aside - Mme Janov, ne pourrait-elle pas venir ici nous parler parfois?). No wonder these delusions of a sick society had always confused me and enraged me! My only quibble with her use of the word hope, and the way Dr Janov usually uses it in his writings, is that this so-called "hope" is a false hope, a compensatory drug-like "hope", perhaps to be very clearly distinguished from the true hope of the more open human being that has faced, to a certain extent, his unconscious despair, Pain, or whatever you want to call it.

    Nenad also makes the important point that almost all human cultures seem to have these religions, which begs the question as to why human beings seem to be so sick on the whole.I often ponder that question. There is perhaps another distinction , though, that needs to be made between the religions of so-called "civilised" people like in our Western civilsation, and the religions of "primitive" peoples which seem to be on the whole more "pantheistic". Reich though that the dynamics of these latter where different from "civilised" religions and wrote about this in one of his books. He was very influenced by an anthropologist named Malinowski, while the Freudians at the time had their pet anthropologist, Geza Roheim (?), who used Freud's theories to "analyse" these "primitive" cultures. But I don't know enough about anthropology , and this aspect of Reich's work, to say more than that.

    Marco

    ReplyDelete
  27. Sieglinde: I've often wondered about this "identity" thing. I don't know if I have one as such, or even want one.

    Is an identity a reality or a kind of subjective decision? I'm not sure. I notice people don't listen to certain kinds of music (and other) if it doesn't integrate with their 'identity', and that kind of behaviour to me often seems like a kind of unnatural suppression - that is, the identity regulates what we do and do not respond to, and in what kind of way.

    I'm suspicious that what we recognise as an identity may be (or can be) only a defence in its own right.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Dear Art,
    You are probably aware of this recent article
    www.nytimes.com/2010/11/09/health/09brain.html
    about the role of epigenetics in psychiatric disorders, but just in case I am sending this link. In a few years, much will become known about the effect of early traumas on gene methylation, etc., and the possible reversal by drugs or environmental conditions.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Marco: If you want France to come and lecture in France you need to get a group of people who can pay just her expenses to get there. There is no salary asked for. AJ

    ReplyDelete
  30. "a primal crisis...usually occurs to people when they are in enormous pain or on the brink of it. It is really the snapping point and it occurs when the person can no longer defend."

    And so...what?

    Is the solution to face the black hole of nothingness and commit suicide?

    Do you know anyone, really, who lives without hope?

    What is hope-less life about? Buddhists monks promoted "detachment" while using children as sex and labor slaves. They also said life was ephemeral while building stone temples decorated in gold. Hypocrites? All too human? What?

    What if the "despairing" person finds that love is as real as "nothingness"?

    Why cry if nothing means anything? Are tears just for cleaning our eyes?

    Whenever I read philosophers/writers who say life has no meaning, I know they've not been loved enough. Only someone who is unloved would try to deny the existence and power of love. All the books in the world can't contain the love in one Granny hug.

    Maybe that's the problem: A zillion "art" objects can't fill the hole in one's soul caused by the loss of a Rosebud sled.

    Religions aren't wrong because they espouse hope. They err when they try to prevent congregations from feeling and expressing real feelings. Hope is real because love is real. Trying to deny hope is just another way to try to moderate the pain of needing and not getting. It's an attempt to kill need.

    If you think life has no meaning you are saying you aren't loved.

    Even if the "universe" were created by El Retardo (a blind unfeeling block of endless obsidian), so what? We still love and feel and need.

    If nothing matters, why do children cry when pets die? Why aren't they content being told Fido morphed into inert matter composed of x chemicals?

    It's not cloth that makes teddy bears important.

    Primal Therapy runs the risk of becoming too intellectual. It can become as "stuck" as cognitive therapy. I mean, c''mon: Did Immanuel Kant ever get laid? Is soma subservient to psyche? I"m not advocating pure sensualism, just saying over-thinking is no better than sexual compulsion.

    We hear a lot about dysfunction. What does "healthy" living look like? What is "good enough"? Is PT now the "one and only true way," Art as Jesus-Moses-Mohammed-Buddha-Krishna?

    Sometimes, when the world is too much with me, I put on Kurt Elling's "The Best Things Happen While You're Dancing" and feel great. Does that mean I'm effed-up? Should I be staring at blank walls, instead, "getting" the futility and pain of life?

    ReplyDelete
  31. DR Janov: My invitation was for your wife to come and exchange with us here on this blog, not to come and lecture where I live, which is in Quebec, not France. Sorry if I was not clear. But, come to think about it,that might be an interesting project to plan a lecture for her. However, since I am in no professionnal milieu, know no one into Primal in Quebec apart from one person in your network, and know of no other sponsoring organisations here as yet that would be interested in such a lecture,I would have to put that off for the long-term future.

    One last thing: I alluded , in one of my posts on this thread, to the typical conversion experience that Bill Wilson, a founder of Alcoholics Anonymous, underwent, as a pillar of the AA organisation's approach. Someone pointed out to me that perhaps one key aspect of this otherwise typical conversion was that the drug belladonna , an hallucinogen (I beleive), was administered to him just before his conversion (there were some experiments going on with the drug for alcoholics at that time).Perhaps what happenned to him was more akin to what happens to some of those taking LSD ,than a "pure" conversion experience (or are these experiences perhaps basically the same thing, in the Primal sense?). Bill Wilson, by the way, took some LSD with Aldous Huxley in the early 50's , which threw many in the AA organisation for a loop, considering their drug- abstinence orientation.

    Marco

    ReplyDelete
  32. Here is my (here always relevant) opinion:

    A more or less curative ‘primal therapeutic replay’ of a long-previously automatically made ‘recording’ of - or replay of what was in the past ‘conditioned-in’ by - a “traumatizing” or, more precisely put, not just a “specific hibernation (SH) imploring” but SH-inducing combination of milieu factors, can only occur if the 'LTP’ed (Long Termed Potentiated) output of excitatory signals *aspect*' of the totality of the conditioned-in aftermath of such a predicament (or ordeal or adverse challenge of this type) is thereby made (or induced) to undergo highly specific LTP-extinguishing change (plausibly involving the endocannabinoid system) OR, if the primal therapeutically facilitated “replay” leads to that the same “conditioned-in” central neural source of motivation receives highly specific inhibitory feedback from neurons recruited FOR THE FIRST TIME by help of a properly primal-therapeutically provided facilitation of such a most-precise feedback within a “PTSD-plagued” person’s actention selection serving system.

    The “LTD’ed (Long Term Depressed) aspect” of by traumatic predicaments conditioned-in Pain (primal pain) the ASSS will thereby also tend to ‘wither away’.

    If someone think they have a better science-aligned hypothesis, please let me (Art and the rest of us who have some sort of penchant for primal therapy) know about it!

    ReplyDelete
  33. Hi Art,

    This is wonderfull!!
    There is one intelectualist here in Serbia who says that there is in every human being property of "homo religiosis". It means that every person have need to believe in something.
    What do you think about that? Still, we have cortex and thinking mind and abstract mind, we are not without that parts of brain...so we use these parts, and we believe, plan, think, judge risks of something etc...
    Being religious does not means necessary, believing in god, we can believe in something rational and real:for example: love and hope(which are also used by bible) and theories which our brain suggests to us, which are not necessary irrational, just because we believe, right or wrong?

    It is better to read and believe and to use Art Janov's work than Bible, because it is advanced in my criterium, realistic, and also can give a hope for better tommorow(if you go to Primal therapy or trying to act normally in harmony with Primal)

    We dont need super being, faith in that being, someone who will save us in our mind from approaching cataclism...
    There is mundanely theory, which also good encompassing, right?

    Nenad

    ReplyDelete
  34. Trevor, you are getting what I write backwards. Look in my Primal Healing and Biology of Love about love. OK? art janov

    ReplyDelete