Articles on Primal Therapy, psychogenesis, causes of psychological traumas, brain development, psychotherapies, neuropsychology, neuropsychotherapy. Discussions about causes of anxiety, depression, psychosis, consequences of the birth trauma and life before birth.
Friday, October 29, 2010
Prototypes and Sex: The Hijack
I have written about the prototype before. It is that traumatic event that impacts the fetal system and changes its evolutionary trajectory. It helps set up who we become later on and warps our personality. It also directs how we react to the trauma at birth, (if there was one).A carrying mother smoking a half-pack a day, and then suffering from lack of oxygen at birth. A lack of oxygen would compound the prenatal asphyxiation and warp the development of personality. The memory is then stamped-in so that it governs all future behavior in the event of stress.
It is the limbic system, most particularly the hippocampus, with a bit of help from the amygdala and striatum, which scans history and automatically finds the prototype, the imprint that originally fixed the survival mode for the organism. This survival reaction becomes fixed and directs us for a lifetime. Of course it can be compounded by later events in childhood.
Let us keep in mind the prototype when trying to understand sex. To reiterate: high excitation in sex can be taken as a danger by the system because the original high level of excitation was a danger. The system cannot distinguish between the two since they have an equal force or valence. In this way sexual stimulation can trigger off the original trauma and our reaction to it. The brainwave patterns of past and present become indistinguishable so that sex and trauma fuse and run off identically together. It is the hijack. They are old friends. Sex climbs aboard the trauma vehicle and goes along for the ride; but it goes where the trauma takes it and no place else. It leads the way because it involves survival. That is what is reawakened during sexual activation. That is why we can examine sex life and look back to the kind of birth and pre-birth that the person underwent. In this way when there is an excess of stimulation there is an immediate shutdown or shut-off; the very same reaction as originally. Sex stops abruptly when a certain level of excitation is achieved.
We can look at birth and predict the kinds of sex problems there may be in the future. This is in general terms; there are many other factors that play into this equation but in an overall sense it holds true. I am focusing for now on what has been left out of the equation. Conversely, we can look at sexual behavior and post-dict (look back) on the kind of prenatal and birth-life one has undergone.
Because pain insinuates itself into sexual behavior with the identical imprinted force, it seems clear that once pain is felt for what it is there will be radical changes in sexual conduct. Sex will no longer be a conduit for something else but will be what it is. Pain will no longer be rerouted into sexual rituals by the limbic system because pain will no longer be a factor.
During the reliving, the whole physiologic system joins in the fray. It must be; otherwise it is not a valid, complete memory, and not curative. The same blood pressure, heart rate and vascular processes are there. We can measure the trauma and its force in this way. We can estimate the effects certain events have on sex, as well as other behaviors. Ordinarily, the voyage to our depths is not a difficult trip when we consider that current feelings are an elaboration of early sensations.
If we take care to allow the brain to follow its own evolution and do not talk too much or exert too much control in therapy the therapy is usually successful. If we abstain from intellectual control and third line discussion we will find the patient going back in time in ordered fashion. This will happen if we have no preconceived ideas or anti-evolutionary theories about what the patient has to do. We need to trust the process and above all, trust feelings. These feelings lie in a different universe of discourse from conventional therapy. Follow the brain. Follow evolution because evolution follows us. That is the key to successful therapy of sex problems.
One final word: Yes, it does help to deal directly with sex problems just as one would give shots or pills to the migraine sufferer. Palliatives are sometimes very necessary. No one should suffer until final cure is achieved.
Dear Art ,I can underscore the notion that "sex can trigger off the past trauma " -only some days the mere t h o u g h t of sex aggravated my anxiety and depression.
ReplyDeleteWhether it is the result of an imprint in the womb ..or the remembrance of the terror feelings
resulting in my excessive masturbations after feelings of humiliation tenssion etc . I am not
sure of , but it`s very irritating to say the least...! Sincerely Yours emanuel
Art, I am really looking forward to my adventure in LA, but if you guys encourage patients to enter their sexual feelings, then I will request some studio editing of the video footage, and I would rather not have a gay therapist. (lesbian is ok)
ReplyDeleteArt,
ReplyDeleteI "know" you are damn right in everything you write about… but if it does not help us ... we poor wretches who has no opportunity to be able to get through hell by our selves... what do you want us to do? We are following you with light and candle and become more and more "aware" of what we need to do ... when even cognitive activities leads forward in a sense by your writing? Our heads spin ... the calm you see is only deceiving appearances. Art ... I know that it is very important to you to keep your work safe… everything you have done is very well worth it ... but for us… please come with something concrete things we can do for our selves... a chance you my must take.
Frank
What do you mean? AJ
ReplyDeleteWell, sex is a huge trigger for me. When a girl is feeling horny and wants to have sex with me, if I like her, I immediately feel very cold and start shaking so much that I can't hold a drink without spilling it (I'm serious). The time when I felt, for six hours, like I was going to die or go crazy...I had smoked some weed, but that hellish reaction happened the moment I opened a porno mag. And more recently I had a sexual dream and it led to some kind of first line reaction...sleep psychosis or whatever you want to call it.
ReplyDeleteWhen I see a girl who is sexually aroused for real, it turns me on. Mirror neurons? I'm sure primal therapists have mirror neurons too. I don't want a gay male therapist who gets turned on while I am in a sexual feeling. Yuck.
If a female therapist is turned on by my sexual feelings, that's not so yuck.
If I am with a heterosexual male therapist who has a clinical attitude towards my sexual feelings, that's yucky too because really I would rather not have someone watching me....but hey, this is primal therapy, right?
If I am not allowed to choose my therapist, then I will accept who I am given. I'm sure they are all good.
Richard: Sexual feelings are just another set of feelings. I am certain that no Primal therapist would push you, or even wish to push you, into any particular feeling: THAT IS YOUR CHOICE. A feeling-full therapist will primarily listen to you--it is in YOUR talking that your subconscious feelings 'peep out' . It is at that point that the therapist will assess just how much to encourage you in that vain. The therapist are trained intensively for this very purpose. The therapists sexual feelings towards a patient is an absolute NO-NO in psychotherapy and to do so would lead to revoking that therapist license to practice.
ReplyDeleteNot wanting a particular therapist should be a matter of compatibility after meeting.
Chances of you knowing your therapists proclivities of any kind would be something you might only discover after many sessions and even then not necessarily. If you are scarred of gay males, but fascinated by gay females, that would be something to talk about in your sessions, if, and when you (the patient) is ready to talk about it.
In Primal therapy, the patient is king.
Well said Jack, AJ
ReplyDeleteRichard: right. they are all good and you don't have to worry about sexual feelings. A
ReplyDeleteFrank: Frank you mean it is not enough to spend 40 years developing a theory and therapy to help people and then set up a clinic to treat people? I can do no more. I need all your help to develop ideas, pressure and then a program to do something about it. I tried to give away my therapy to several governments all of whom turned it down. art janov
ReplyDeleteHi. Off topic:
ReplyDeleteDr Janov, will your book-in-preparation "Beyond Belief" be published in the near future? If not, would someone like me be able to get a copy of the manuscript? If so, at what cost? As I have mentionned elsewhere,this aspect of your work, belief systems -as-defense, really fascinates me the most, and I would like to read as much as I can of what you wrote on the subject. Thank you.
Marco
Art,
ReplyDeleteYes you've done enough… more than in off… what I am saying is that we also are individuals who are in a need… need as parallelizes us from what we would and could do if we new …need we do not know the consequences of. We are in silence screaming out the pain… need that could go very wrong and are doing so without the help of primal therapy. This is why I beg you to give us all of your knowledge for as les as possible should go wrong… if not on your blog my by internet in a form of round table talk… done as safe as possible? Life passes too fast and without a sincere chance to live.
Frank
You know Frank it is not a bad idea to do a round table with us and staff. I will discuss it in a week or so with the staff. Thanks for the suggestion. AJ
ReplyDeleteMarco: I have to think about it cause I have an agent who sells my books so I cannot just decide to put it on the internet. art janov
ReplyDeleteHi Dr Janov: I am not asking you to put your Beyond belief book on the Internet,that would not make sense commercially. I am just asking if I, personally, could buy a copy of the manuscript.If not, no problem, of course.
ReplyDeleteI really do hope that book gets published eventually.Based on what I know of what you have written on the topic elsewhere,that book would probably really help a lot of concerned people understand why belief systems are usually so rigid and impermeable to argument, amongst other things.
Marco
Marco: I agree. The problem is that the publishers have a confidentially clause that prevents us from putting out the mscpt. I am considering it, however. AJ
ReplyDeleteDr. Janov,
ReplyDeletethe latest research results should not get unnoticed:
Sexually Abused Children at Risk for Adult Psychosis
By Rick Nauert PhD Senior News Editor
Reviewed by John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on November 4, 2010
A new report suggests children who are sexually abused may be at higher risk for developing schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders.
The Austrian study found that a history of sexual abuse with penetration especially increased the risk.
Previous studies have established that abused children are more likely to develop depression, anxiety, substance abuse, borderline personality disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and suicidal behavior, according to background information in the article.
More at:
http://psychcentral.com/news/2010/11/04/sexually-abused-children-at-risk-for-adult-psychosis/20535.html
Sieglinde
Could I ask one thing before your next book is published? This would be for people who are not right-brain dominant to proofread and edit it.
ReplyDeleteI did a sixth reading of Primal Healing slowly and methodically last month while waiting for my next Skype session. I couldn't help but notice again that there are 70-80 grammatical, spelling, and other errors in it that a left-brain dominant editor would have corrected.
Its my bias to think that these errors will hamper acceptance of your work.
Art,
ReplyDeleteMay I ask about what proportion of your patients have been seriously sexually abused?
Rarely among males. About one out of four females. AJ
ReplyDeletePrice: I am surprised as we went over the mscpt many times and corrected it all. Quote me a couple of the errors. thanks AJ
ReplyDeletePrice: There's seems something compulsive about reading Arts work looking for errors, or being irritated by them. Many have critiqued me for my typos, spellings, syntax errors and punctuations (even on this blog). I admit to being very backwards on all these points (thank Godot for instant spell checks), but my critics (mostly very adept at the written word) haven't written a book. Is it really that important to be so, so precise with the written word. Is it not more important that the message is put forward? Eg. "know what I mean", "get my drift"
ReplyDeleteInterestingly I received an email about a study that if most words just put in the right first and last letter, even though the rest are randomly jumbled that the text is readable and understandable. With the advent of text-ing and emails it seems a new written English (and perhaps spoken) is being developed, that for us brought up in the old tradition, will not be adept at. Great! what is so sacrosanct about language anyway? It's supposedly meant to convey meaning, but often fails as is evidenced in the last mid-term election here in the US. IMO is all about feelings and their expression in the end.
Jack: I didn't re-read Primal Healing to find errors. I re-read it because I needed a Skype session, and it was going to be almost a month before I could get scheduled.
ReplyDeleteAJ: This weekend I'll put together a sample from Chapter 3 and post it here.
AJ: As a sample, here are items I find in Chapter 3 of Primal Healing that a left-brain oriented editor would probably have changed. It is an important chapter, and I always tell the people whom I give the book to read Chapter 3 if nothing else.
ReplyDeletep.59 graphic: 'gaging' should be 'gagging'
p. 60 para. 2 sentence 1: 'bottom, rear' should be 'bottom rear'
p. 60 para. 3 sentence 6: 'experience is not stored as ideas' should be 'experiences are not stored as ideas'
p. 65 para. 2 sentence 3: 'fear and' should be 'fear, and'
p. 72 para. 3 sentence 2: 'anesthetia' should be 'anesthesia'
p. 72 para. 3 sentence 8: 'patients is' should be 'patient is'
p. 73 para. 3 sentence 10: 'fabriacted' should be 'fabricated'
p. 76 para. 4 sentence 7: 'something in lower levels of the brain are' should be 'something in lower levels of the brain is'
p. 79 para. 1 sentence 3: 'information from both inside and out are' should be 'information from both inside and out is'
p. 79 para. 2 sentence 7: 'it is all of a piece' should be something like 'it is all a piece of..'
PRice:
ReplyDeleteI think rules can sometimes be broken because, sometimes, it actually reads better. But well done on your eye for these things!
On my own blog I still find old errors (of the type I'm not happy with) because it can be so hard to see your own mistakes, as your brain "reads" what it knows should be there rather than what is actually there.
Personally though, I doubt that those errors you found will have an impact on Janov's 'authoritative' image.