Articles on Primal Therapy, psychogenesis, causes of psychological traumas, brain development, psychotherapies, neuropsychology, neuropsychotherapy. Discussions about causes of anxiety, depression, psychosis, consequences of the birth trauma and life before birth.
Wednesday, June 3, 2015
How Do You Prove Primal Therapy?
I have been going on about my therapy for years that it is the cure. So what does that mean?
I have always been warned not to use the word “prove,” cause nothing is proved in science; it is supported, confirmed, strengthened but never proved. So why do I go on with the word? Therein lies the rub because ……first, let me lay out what I mean.
I will use the example of psychosis to explain. Over decades as patients descend down into and back to their early past they begin to lose articulation and have trouble forming sentences; it means they are still on the emotional right level with twinges of left brain verbal skills which begin to diminish. As they go back more they lose their capacity for words and if they should use complicated words to describe their feelings it is a false primal. Why? Because the more remote the Primal trip the less capacity for words there is. A two year old does not have the capacity for sophisticated language. If it is a true reliving it would be impossible and usually is. Mind you, this is after a long time in therapy and after many lesser pains are experienced.
As the patient begins to drop into gestational life there is more pain than one can imagine, soon, it is a pain that does not hurt inside because it becomes a feeling that is being felt. It looks like pain but it is a manageable one, unless the patient is led or forced into the emotional depths where experience is premature and out of the question. Here, during this period where the brainstem reigns the pains are the most acute and they can be psychotic making. How do we know? Some patients who have come to us from rebirthing therapy plunge down deep too early and begin delusions and hallucinations. “I see the cosmos and shining angels,” etc. The pain has mounted into the neo-cortex and drove it to manufacture defenses, including false perceptions and bizarre ideas. It is a sure sign of overload and inundation of pain.
Down on this level, as the patient, over time, goes deeper into the past, the pain mounts, which is how we know where the deepest pain lies. We see it and measure it; no guesswork. And when we see it over and over in hundreds of patients over 50 years we begin to get a good idea of our observations. It is consistent and replicable. It is not longer a theory but a precise observation which I call cure. Why? Because when there are such deep experiences, always nonverbal, so much changes; the biology, the appearance, the feelings, the look and the sense of comfort, at last. To say nothing of possibly diverting serious imprints from exacerbating into serious illness later on. Gone are the migraines and high blood pressure and gone is a good deal of the compulsive acting-out, not the least of which is sex.
So here we see the dialectic interplay between memory, deep imprints, the pain and the symptoms it engenders. It avoids guesswork. They all converge into a feeling; it is a unified event. We are not working on this symptom or that; we are working on the whole system as it responds to the deepest and most devastating imprints. Feeling them then radiates everywhere in the system so that the effects are systemic-- effects throughout the system.
We are not looking to conform a private theory; we are developing a theory out of our observations. Experience first, deep brain observations first, then the theory and the hypotheses. The patients’ experiences do not confirm the theory or the hypothesis, it is the theory that goes or changes or modifies. I have no desire to hang onto some concocted theory that I adore. If it does not make the patient better then why hang onto it? This is largely what happened to all those therapists who wanted to improve on our theory. They added drugs to the mix, then hypnosis, then cognitive and so on ad nauseam. All because they never saw the central truth of feeling. And, I assume, because they never underwent their own feelings.
Friday, May 29, 2015
The Anti-Primal Solution: Meaning Ayayay
I don’t know why I read the NY Times articles which publishes grinders for me, (NY Times, May 17, 2015 see: http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com//2015/05/16/no-longer-wanting-to-die/). They love Behavior Therapy and meanwhile I cannot get one of my articles in their paper. This blog is a follow-up to the one I just published called, ON BEING LONELY (see: http://cigognenews.blogspot.com/2015/05/on-feeling-lonely-again.html). I hope to show the bankruptcy of non-dynamic approaches that leave science far behind; where therapists become a cheering section for the oppressed. “You can do it; But, you have to accept yourself first”.
Whaaat? I sit here thinking, “How on earth can I do that?” Let’s say I tell myself I am good, smart and warm. But wait a minute I am completely unconvinced. I don’t feel that way. My whole history makes me feel bad, dumb and worthless, which is absolutely true of my early life. You mean I should deny who I am and take on another persona who is loveable? Gee, I’ll try. Darn, I just can’t do it. Now what do I do? I know… I will pretend and please my doctor.
This is about the patient who entered Behavior Therapy for suicidal depression. He had shock therapy plus years of psychotherapy plus drug after drug; nothing worked.
The opening gambit finds the therapist informing the patient that to get well the first step has to be to “accept yourself as you are.” These admonitions are throwbacks to early Gestalt therapy, which was “sold” by Fritz Perls. After he told everyone what to do and how to live, the patient had then to kiss him to end the session. This advice has no rationale whatsoever and has no basis in science; it is every man for himself. Caprice replaces science.
So let’s go on with his therapy, which has a major space in the NY Times. This therapy was finally accepted by the patient, and by inference, the NY Times, as well.
The patient’s problems had a history but was again set off by a failed business deal. He was known as “treatment resistant depression.” The therapy was not in question; it was his resistance to it. How neat.
Along comes a new therapy, or should I say a new label for an old treatment, known as Dialectic Behavior Therapy. I assume they mean some kind of improvement on Behavior Therapy. It is aimed at suicidal patients. Dr Linehan, the founder, claims that Behavior Therapy couldn’t work for her so she developed a new approach.
What it does is help patients “identify and change negative and erroneous thoughts". This sounds precisely like Behavior Therapy. Dr. Linehan says that the problem with staying on this approach is that it treats the patients’ pain being all in the head, and that “belittles the patient.” What has to happen according to her is that the patient, first and foremost, must accept himself and be accepted by others as he is. She realizes that sometimes the person is also overwhelmed by emotions. So she recommends some skills to stop the flooding of emotions.
“It lies in the pivotal moment between experiencing the feeling and acting on it.” So she finds a way: take ice from the fridge and hold it on your neck. Distract yourself. Snap a rubber band on your wrist. Etc, ad nauseam. In other words, never feel the feelings but treat them as intruders and enemies to avoid. The only thing that could help healing, feeling one’s feelings, becomes an anathema. It is anti-healing and anti-Primal. Which has been given a big boost from an august newspaper.
This so-called new therapy is a simple turn on the usual Behavior Therapy. No scientist need apply because science is not welcome here.
So the therapist believes there is improvement because the distraction (is that really therapy?) lowers anxiety. Is that measured or still part of the booga booga approach? After a lifetime of being criticized and belittled by parents she argues it can be undone by talking to yourself. Ayayay. It is still all in her head and now in the patient’s who thinks he is better.
So every time a feeling comes up, instead of feeling it and improving she asks patients to do the opposite and stop feeling. Stop getting well, for no matter what she says, it is still “in your head.”
Where are earth does she get her ideas about feelings? Where does she think they come from? Do they come from space or are they the results of our experience? What experience? Does the patient have no history, no previous neglect, or trauma? This is exactly and only Behavior Therapy. It is not new, does not make any improvement and treats the patient as ahistoric.
A slight postscript: what does Dr. Linehan think is the role of feelings? Does she know that they are guideposts, that they warn us of threat and danger? That they signal illness and problems internally. That they lead to love and caring and empathy? That they lead us to make good decisions that are salutary for ourselves?
So why are feelings there? To allow us to love and be loved, to help others, to sympathize with others’ plight and to help us establish good relationships. They are not our enemy; they help save our lives. Above all, even though we all have feeling centers, not all of us have access to feelings. Some of us are so shut off that we are basically unfeeling. What makes us really human are feelings; why on earth do we want to suppress them?
I think my departing point from Dr. Linehan is that when she sees emerging feelings, she rushes in to divert the patient away from them. When we see feelings we help the patient into them in slow methodic fashion, so that he becomes a feeling, sensate human being. This is the way he becomes human, learns to love and be loved and gets rid of his Primal Demons that have plagued him.
Since we are historic beings how can we get well in an anti-feeling way? We can’t.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Review of "Beyond Belief"
This thought-provoking and important book shows how people are drawn toward dangerous beliefs.
“Belief can manifest itself in world-changing ways—and did, in some of history’s ugliest moments, from the rise of Adolf Hitler to the Jonestown mass suicide in 1979. Arthur Janov, a renowned psychologist who penned The Primal Scream, fearlessly tackles the subject of why and how strong believers willingly embrace even the most deranged leaders.
Beyond Belief begins with a lucid explanation of belief systems that, writes Janov, “are maps, something to help us navigate through life more effectively.” While belief systems are not presented as inherently bad, the author concentrates not just on why people adopt belief systems, but why “alienated individuals” in particular seek out “belief systems on the fringes.” The result is a book that is both illuminating and sobering. It explores, for example, how a strongly-held belief can lead radical Islamist jihadists to murder others in suicide acts. Janov writes, “I believe if people had more love in this life, they would not be so anxious to end it in favor of some imaginary existence.”
One of the most compelling aspects of Beyond Belief is the author’s liberal use of case studies, most of which are related in the first person by individuals whose lives were dramatically affected by their involvement in cults. These stories offer an exceptional perspective on the manner in which belief systems can take hold and shape one’s experiences. Joan’s tale, for instance, both engaging and disturbing, describes what it was like to join the Hare Krishnas. Even though she left the sect, observing that participants “are stunted in spiritual awareness,” Joan considers returning someday because “there’s a certain protection there.”
Janov’s great insight into cultish leaders is particularly interesting; he believes such people have had childhoods in which they were “rejected and unloved,” because “only unloved people want to become the wise man or woman (although it is usually male) imparting words of wisdom to others.” This is just one reason why Beyond Belief is such a thought-provoking, important book.”
Barry Silverstein, Freelance Writer
Quotes for "Life Before Birth"
“Life Before Birth is a thrilling journey of discovery, a real joy to read. Janov writes like no one else on the human mind—engaging, brilliant, passionate, and honest.
He is the best writer today on what makes us human—he shows us how the mind works, how it goes wrong, and how to put it right . . . He presents a brand-new approach to dealing with depression, emotional pain, anxiety, and addiction.”
Paul Thompson, PhD, Professor of Neurology, UCLA School of Medicine
Art Janov, one of the pioneers of fetal and early infant experiences and future mental health issues, offers a robust vision of how the earliest traumas of life can percolate through the brains, minds and lives of individuals. He focuses on both the shifting tides of brain emotional systems and the life-long consequences that can result, as well as the novel interventions, and clinical understanding, that need to be implemented in order to bring about the brain-mind changes that can restore affective equanimity. The transitions from feelings of persistent affective turmoil to psychological wholeness, requires both an understanding of the brain changes and a therapist that can work with the affective mind at primary-process levels. Life Before Birth, is a manifesto that provides a robust argument for increasing attention to the neuro-mental lives of fetuses and infants, and the widespread ramifications on mental health if we do not. Without an accurate developmental history of troubled minds, coordinated with a recognition of the primal emotional powers of the lowest ancestral regions of the human brain, therapists will be lost in their attempt to restore psychological balance.
Jaak Panksepp, Ph.D.
Bailey Endowed Chair of Animal Well Being Science
Washington State University
Dr. Janov’s essential insight—that our earliest experiences strongly influence later well being—is no longer in doubt. Thanks to advances in neuroscience, immunology, and epigenetics, we can now see some of the mechanisms of action at the heart of these developmental processes. His long-held belief that the brain, human development, and psychological well being need to studied in the context of evolution—from the brainstem up—now lies at the heart of the integration of neuroscience and psychotherapy.
Grounded in these two principles, Dr. Janov continues to explore the lifelong impact of prenatal, birth, and early experiences on our brains and minds. Simultaneously “old school” and revolutionary, he synthesizes traditional psychodynamic theories with cutting-edge science while consistently highlighting the limitations of a strict, “top-down” talking cure. Whether or not you agree with his philosophical assumptions, therapeutic practices, or theoretical conclusions, I promise you an interesting and thought-provoking journey.
Lou Cozolino, PsyD, Professor of Psychology, Pepperdine University
In Life Before Birth Dr. Arthur Janov illuminates the sources of much that happens during life after birth. Lucidly, the pioneer of primal therapy provides the scientific rationale for treatments that take us through our original, non-verbal memories—to essential depths of experience that the superficial cognitive-behavioral modalities currently in fashion cannot possibly touch, let alone transform.
Gabor Maté MD, author of In The Realm of Hungry Ghosts: Close Encounters With Addiction
An expansive analysis! This book attempts to explain the impact of critical developmental windows in the past, implores us to improve the lives of pregnant women in the present, and has implications for understanding our children, ourselves, and our collective future. I’m not sure whether primal therapy works or not, but it certainly deserves systematic testing in well-designed, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trials.
K.J.S. Anand, MBBS, D. Phil, FAACP, FCCM, FRCPCH, Professor of Pediatrics, Anesthesiology, Anatomy & Neurobiology, Senior Scholar, Center for Excellence in Faith and Health, Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare System
A baby's brain grows more while in the womb than at any time in a child's life. Life Before Birth: The Hidden Script That Rules Our Lives is a valuable guide to creating healthier babies and offers insight into healing our early primal wounds. Dr. Janov integrates the most recent scientific research about prenatal development with the psychobiological reality that these early experiences do cast a long shadow over our entire lifespan. With a wealth of experience and a history of successful psychotherapeutic treatment, Dr. Janov is well positioned to speak with clarity and precision on a topic that remains critically important.
Paula Thomson, PsyD, Associate Professor, California State University, Northridge & Professor Emeritus, York University
"I am enthralled.
Dr. Janov has crafted a compelling and prophetic opus that could rightly dictate
PhD thesis topics for decades to come. Devoid of any "New Age" pseudoscience,
this work never strays from scientific orthodoxy and yet is perfectly accessible and
downright fascinating to any lay person interested in the mysteries of the human psyche."
Dr. Bernard Park, MD, MPH
His new book “Life Before Birth: The Hidden Script that Rules Our Lives” shows that primal therapy, the lower-brain therapeutic method popularized in the 1970’s international bestseller “Primal Scream” and his early work with John Lennon, may help alleviate depression and anxiety disorders, normalize blood pressure and serotonin levels, and improve the functioning of the immune system.
One of the book’s most intriguing theories is that fetal imprinting, an evolutionary strategy to prepare children to cope with life, establishes a permanent set-point in a child's physiology. Baby's born to mothers highly anxious during pregnancy, whether from war, natural disasters, failed marriages, or other stressful life conditions, may thus be prone to mental illness and brain dysfunction later in life. Early traumatic events such as low oxygen at birth, painkillers and antidepressants administered to the mother during pregnancy, poor maternal nutrition, and a lack of parental affection in the first years of life may compound the effect.
In making the case for a brand-new, unified field theory of psychotherapy, Dr. Janov weaves together the evolutionary theories of Jean Baptiste Larmarck, the fetal development studies of Vivette Glover and K.J.S. Anand, and fascinating new research by the psychiatrist Elissa Epel suggesting that telomeres—a region of repetitive DNA critical in predicting life expectancy—may be significantly altered during pregnancy.
After explaining how hormonal and neurologic processes in the womb provide a blueprint for later mental illness and disease, Dr. Janov charts a revolutionary new course for psychotherapy. He provides a sharp critique of cognitive behavioral therapy, psychoanalysis, and other popular “talk therapy” models for treating addiction and mental illness, which he argues do not reach the limbic system and brainstem, where the effects of early trauma are registered in the nervous system.
“Life Before Birth: The Hidden Script that Rules Our Lives” is scheduled to be published by NTI Upstream in October 2011, and has tremendous implications for the future of modern psychology, pediatrics, pregnancy, and women’s health.
Editor