The more painkillers a woman takes during labor the more likely her child will be to abuse drugs or alcohol later on. Karin Nyberg of the University of Gothenburg, Sweden, looked at medication given to the mothers of 69 adult drug users and 33 of their siblings who did not take drugs (Nyberg, et al., 2000). Twenty-three percent of the drug abusers were exposed to multiple doses of barbiturates or opiates in the hours just before birth. Only three percent of their siblings were exposed to the same levels of drugs in utero. If the mother received three or more doses of drugs, her child was five times more likely to abuse drugs later on in life. Enough animal studies have been done to confirm the finding—exposure to drugs in the womb changes the individual's propensity for drugs later on.
There is some evidence that a mother taking downers during pregnancy will have an offspring who later will be addicted to amphetamines, known as “uppers” (speed) (Jacobson, et al., 1988); while a mother taking uppers during pregnancy—coffee, cocaine, caffeinated colas, may produce an offspring later addicted to downers—Quaaludes, for example. And the reason that the person can take inordinate doses, such as drinking two cups of coffee before bedtime and still be able to sleep easily, is that there exists a major deficiency of stimulating hormones—the catecholamines. In short, the original set points for activation or repression have been altered during womb-life and persist for a lifetime.
I have treated patients who have taken enormous doses of speed and yet have shown very little mania as a result. While other patients of mine have taken lethal doses of painkillers in previous suicide attempts, enough to kill anyone else, and yet still lie awake hours later, only feeling slightly drugged. The severe brain activation by imprinted pain resists any attempts to quell the system.
Jacobson, B., Nyberg, K., Eklund, G., Bygdeman, M., Rydberg, U. (1988) Obstetric pain medication and eventual adult amphetamine addiction in offspring. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 67:677-682.
Nyberg, K., Buka, S.L., and Lipsitt, L. (2000). Perinatal Medication as a Potential Risk Factor for Adult Drug Abuse in a North American Cohort. Epidemiology 11(6):715-716.
Hi Dr Janov
ReplyDeleteI totally get this. It's amazing research especially with someone trying to counter something that happened to them decades before. I have a friend who drinks gallons of coffee a day. If he ever comes to stay my wife and I always tease him that he needs a nuclear amount of coffee to get him going in the morning. he's so dopy as to almost fall over. He's 50 now, so whatever his Mother was taking in the 1950's in the UK must have had an effect. I wonder what it was?
However I still think the other 77 percent is also interesting. Why do those other drug addicts still become addicted?
Planespotter: You can also read: http://cigognenews.blogspot.fr/2012/05/addiction-its-not-about-brain-by-bruce.html and http://cigognenews.blogspot.fr/2010/08/more-on-addiction.html
DeleteArt.
Obviously the addiction is due to unmet need. The pain of not getting one's needs met from early childhood. I gather that the orbitofrontal cortex is one of the parts of the brain that is damaged if a child is left to cry out at night for example. Thus the need for being held and comforted by a Parent at night when tiny gets burned into the brain as pain. Totally get that.
DeleteI know I bang on about my family a lot but I find their interactions fascinating and it helped me learn a lot about me. I was the listener so everyone talked to me so I picked up a lot but until recently was not able to assemble it into some kind whole.
One group in the family all smoke like chimney's and another one drinks like fishes. Both addictions. Mine was alcohol. My Mother neither smokes or drinks. Her addiction is control. Total and utter totalitarian control. So much so my Father probably suffocated to death. Everything is controlled. The plants in the garden can't relax and get established because they get moved. Everything is in continual flux and she blames everything outside her mind and body. She can't sleep so blames some food she ate. The best things to blame are other people because they are not who she expects them to be. My sister is "A selfish little Madam", I am an "Ungrateful little Sod" and all men are wimps and "Everyday is Mother's Day". She invented an invisible friend as a child and was probably when we were little and still is occasionally physcotic now. She lives in a dream world of her own and now that my Father is dead will go slowly barmy and why? So little love in childhood. Everything in her life is about coercing people around her to love her. I felt the pain of the total lack of love in my early life last night. So sad.
I just worry that how can one judge whether one scientific study is undertaken by someone who understands all this like your mate Bruce or by someone cut off from their feelings and thus looking in the wrong direction as Bruce suggests in "It's not about the Brain".
The "knowledge" does not know anything about the psychological issues because it is more related to a physiological process than to be a psychological issue. It is physiologically feel see and hear and it is psychologically to INTERPRET what we feel… see and hear. We interpret the symptom... symptom that is "far" from what caused it. It is indispensable to feel before we can understand... feel what actually is happening. If what I know... I know to not put the question right till why I know what I know... that is the question.
ReplyDeleteFrank
What we do and what is right or wrong is the question concerning the content of the defense evolution refurbished us with... a brain that thinks... plan to alleviate suffering of life-threatening intensity… life-threatening when it was impossible to manage our own sufferings with consequence that blocking substances was produced... a physiological process for survival beyond our ability to influence… at the time "consciously" influence was impossible.
ReplyDeleteIf it is so… then the thinking brain is a product of the evolutionary process for survival... survival more than to be an asset for life in its true "meaning." Then we are victims of what we can understand in a process of healing. What a revolutionary thought… and so right it is! WHAT ARE WE WAITING FOR?
Frank
Hi Frank,
ReplyDelete-"I know to not put the question right till why I know what I know... that is the question"-.
I totally get this now. This is completely resonant with the 3rd line insights I am having.
As we re-gain contact with true feelings the entire organism begins to make small changes from 'less than optimum' set points gradually to 'optimum' set points (in titrated episodes). Consequently the entire function and emotional responsiveness also change. The 3rd line (being the slowest of the three) eventually 'catches up' with all these changes and uses words to try to self reflect on (and to share with others in the group), we call that "Insight". It is inevitable that the literal words of perception alone therefore can not be relied on to actually 'describe & depict' what's going on.
If you are still totally trapped in a cognitive framework (probably by your 1st & 2nd line pain pressing up from below) then you might be unable to break out of a combative way of thinking that assumes words and descriptions of feelings are the enemy.
This is I feel the problem with neurosis on the social scale. If I can extrapolate: Neurotic people trapped in cognitivism can mistake words and totems for the real value in life, consequently interchanging so called 'meaning' for direct feelings AS a combative defence. This would explain why anthropologists may conjecture (from the evolutionary view) that the 3rd line is just a defence mechanism, an outgrowth, such few words but with so many profound implications. I can see why Jack keeps on about this but also why Art says there is more to the 3rd line than just that. . .
Because I am occupied regularly in timber construction, both procurement, design and fabrication with hand tools I know for sure that there is more to the 3rd line. So Jack, please engage in this if you will: I have conversations with other fabricators and a common theme is that we fear for the following generations who may never experience the way the 3rd line can be trained to perform with precision for EVOLUTIONARY purposes. I am not putting my craft / trade on a pedestal but I am saying that if you dedicate your life to something constructive like that, the 're-posturing' that your 3rd (& 2nd) line has to do to thoroughly learn the trade and to get the projects done, to stay in business and to attract new customers becomes a lifestyle that can keep you open to the possibility of true feelings. Many of us constructors therefore wonder how much more repressed young people become in the absence of any really tangible constructive activities.
Ok this is my particular ‘hobby horse’ but nevertheless as we become more computerised and more remote from the means of production and the means of survival we run the risk of increasing neurosis. . . Don't we?
Basically the 3rd line is really not all it's cracked up to be but on the other hand it serves a constructive purpose that reflects the ability to contact true feelings. Which is why (when we are really repressed), what ideas we have in the 3rd line can seem so important, so significant and 'solid'. Until true feelings surface and take the pressure out of that ideation we will inevitably return to 3rd line beliefs.
I am sure of what I am saying because it comes out of my own personal experiences over the last month or so. I have had a less developed insight into this before and I predict that when I eventually contact 1st line stuff in me properly, I will cease to behave like the bloody know all that even I don't like much. Me telling you all this in my emphatic style is (I suspect) 1st line pressure distortion in my 2nd line affecting my 3rd line "convictions".
I'll probably still have the same convictions but without the "emphasis", without the pressure.
Paul G.
Paul: Right and Well done. art
Delete