Saturday, October 29, 2011

“I’ll Have a Cup of Enlightenment, Please.” “Will That Be With or Without Feelings, Sir?” By Bruce Wilson



Mindfulness meditation is the current zeitgeist in psychotherapy. Not surprisingly, it fits hand-in-hand with the other dominant therapeutic modality: cognitive behavioral therapy. In fact, there is now a hybrid of the two called MBCT - mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Both techniques are based on the same mechanism—detachment from feelings and thoughts. The “how” of mindfulness meditation can be summed up simply: sit still for 30 or 40 minutes, keep your eyes slightly open, follow your breath, and pay attention to whatever is going on in your mind and body but don’t do anything about it. Just sit there. When you catch your thoughts drifting, get back to the breath. There are variations on this theme, such as walking meditation and meditation while doing yoga or manual work. In a word, meditation is about paying attention. Be here now! Nothing more, nothing less.

Buddhist meditation, such as that practiced in Zen, strives for a combination of concentration (such as counting the breaths) and open awareness (listening to sounds, noticing things in your environment, etc) The goal is the same—to be attentive to whatever is going on within you and without you, as the Beatles song goes. Vedic forms of meditation usually include a mantra or phrase that is to be repeated over and over while keeping the eyes closed. The intent is to create a state of bliss, which some people call transcendence but I call spacing out. TM, à la the Maharishi, is a form of Vedic meditation.

Today’s popularity of mindfulness in psychology stems from the work of Jon Kabat-Zinn, famous for his stress reduction clinic, established in 1979 at the University of Massachusetts Medical School. You could say that Kabat-Zinn made Zen Buddhism scientifically respectable by stripping it of its religious trappings and subjecting it to clinical research. Over the past 30 years, mindfulness meditation has swept throughout the medical world and is used to treat patients suffering from cardiac disease, terminal cancer, chronic pain, drug and alcohol addictions, and a host of other conditions. Indeed, the research shows that mindfulness meditation can bring a lot of benefit. Practiced diligently, it can reduce the stress response, lower blood pressure, improve immunity, ease depression and anxiety, and even thicken areas of the cortex involved in the regulation of emotions.

So if meditation is so good for you, what’s the problem? The problem, as Janov states, is that it is based on suppression of feelings, or rather, dissociation from them. Meditation is often not calming at all; in its more intense forms, it is practically guaranteed to bring up feelings. Humans are just not made to sit still for hours or days at a time like some sessile creature on the bottom of the sea. We are born to move and to feel, and when feelings do come up in meditation, they can be intense. Serious meditators often experience extreme anxiety or depression—even panic—but rather go into those feelings to find out where they originate, as one does in primal therapy, the meditator is told to sit still and observe them as one might observe clouds floating across the sky. Feelings are neither here nor there. They are to be regarded merely as sensations that arise from nowhere and go back to nowhere—ahistoric, meaningless, even delusory. Over time, the capacity to feel is attenuated as one’s consciousness becomes increasingly rooted in the moment. Here and now. Here and now. Here and now….

Truly dedicated meditators—those who meditate for hours a day and attend frequent retreats—often get to a point where they feel disembodied. Their sense of self diminishes as they advance toward the ultimate goal of enlightenment, where one transcends space, time, and life and death itself to become one with the universe.

Beyond Life and Death? How Real is That?

Admittedly, meditation can make you calmer, more focused, resistant to stress, and more functional, but it must be done daily. In that sense, meditation is like an addiction that requires its regular fix. Stop doing it and your feelings come rushing back. Meditators often report feeling more peaceful—even joyful—after years of practice, but at what cost? Where did the trauma go? What access to feeling has been sacrificed? I know meditators who seem more like animated pieces of wood than feeling human beings. Others may smile beatifically, but exude an aura of passive aggression under the peaceful exterior. Despite the dozens of studies reporting positive results, despite the brain scans showing thicker cortices and lower vital signs, one is led to wonder what happened to the pain. Does it just vanish? Is it true that mindfulness can heal trauma, as its proponents say? Or has the pain just been driven deeper into the body, leaving an appearance of being healed?

My hypothesis is that mindfulness meditation encapsulates those painful feelings and keeps them dissociated from awareness, much as an oyster encapsulates an irritating grain of sand within a pearl. And one must keep them encapsulated with daily meditation for the rest of one’s life. Therapists who specialize in treating PTSD say that mindfulness can help someone examine their traumatic feelings – look at them from afar so to speak – so they can be “reprocessed.” Reprocessing usually means “reappraisal” – i.e. rethinking your feelings rather than taking them at face value. Once again, it is an attempt to control feeling with cognition, in direct contradiction to the affective neuroscience principle that feeling (affect) always trumps cognition.

Personally, I've found mindfulness meditation to be useful for dealing with present-day stress. It can and does provide strength during those times when you need to keep things together but I’ve never mistaken it for healing. It is only an adjunct; a tool to help with difficult feelings and situations until one can resolve them through action in the present or through primaling, whatever is appropriate to the situation. Without attention to feelings, mindfulness meditation is little more than a virtual lobotomy.

Bruce Wilson

9 comments:

  1. thanks Bruce, you have given voice to what i have suspected all along; well done.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Last thread France Janov wrote about gaining “access” to old pain and stopping “tortuous behaviour”.

    The operative word here being tortuous behaviour/ thoughts which in my case elevates bp. It’s difficult sometimes to avoid situations where others choose to dump their pain on you and you feel an injustice has been done you. These situations can be quite overwhelming and agitating long enough about them quickly elevates my bp.

    “No mind” from contentment ie elimination of pain from the past and present ideally is what keeps bp regular.

    Sometimes when these situations send me into overwhelm I will use mindfulness ( as Bruce Wilson has written) the “no mind” technique to shut down thoughts in order to collect myself sufficiently to where I’m able to sort out how to deal with the problem at hand that restores equilibrium and does not create more angst.

    France Janov has illustrated a good starting point is to know yourself, to understand about yourself from a primal perspective.

    Bobe

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Mindfulness without feeling" is often seen to be practiced by parents on their babies and children. I've seen this done by very educated and caring parents and it may actually be the best they can do in some circumstances. How often have you seen a parent direct their child's attention to something that might actually catch the interest of the child in the hope that the child will forget to be uncomfortable or unhappy? Oh, look at the birdie! Sometimes it seems to work for a while. It starts very early - shaking the baby's rattle that's hanging in reach startling the baby into an awareness of the external world away from the suffering of unmet need. If the parents didn't care, the baby wouldn't even have a rattle to play with or would be just allowed to cry and cry while the parents directed their own attention elsewhere. Often a physical stimulus is used like bouncing baby around.

    I saw a boy, perhaps 3 years old, with a group of chattering women on a bus trip a few weeks ago being given this kind of treatment but there was nothing out there that interested him. Soon he found something for himself - he reached out for one of the other women who was happy to take him onto her lap but it wasn't long before the unnameable need arose again. He reached for another woman who took him on her lap and tried to settle him down while continuing the lady talk. This time he seemed to have run out of likely hostesses and instead of reaching for another he tried to get the woman's attention by pointing this way and that. It was probably no accident that she had to move her head a little this way and that to retain eye contact with the woman she was talking to.

    It was at that point that they reached the stop where they were getting off. I wish I could give you a more satisfying ending to the story. Perhaps the kid will grow up to be an MBCT therapist. Jokes aside, the persistence of the little boy speaks of a need for attention far beyond what he could have gotten from grandma and her cronies and a need that might be deviated in all kinds of directions, as he grows up, by such tactics of distraction but never resolved.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The meditation thing sounds like crap, for sure. But in order for an intellect to function well, it does need a period of time where distractions and interference are kept away while the intellect does its thing in behalf of the rest of the mind and its interests. But the stem is always on alert should a fight or flight situation arise.

    But according to the Apollo theory of PT, the intellect cortex does not block anything, anyway. The stem actually does the switching on of the gates. As the sole source of emergency actions, the stem controls all that automatic instinct stuff so that if the gates stay on, you can blame the stem, 1st level. It is also the source of commands to the intellect to think up something to distract or comfort the mind and avoid setting off pain that the stem does not want to let go.

    When the stem perceives it is right, then it sends the pain signals up into the cortex. It is sort of an automatic reflex like puking or the like. If the stem is not entirely comfortable with circumstances, it may resist doing anything like sending up pain to be integrated.

    But in blaming the cortex, we miss the fact that the stem is displeased with something or other. Blame is easy to spread around but that does not mean it is accurate. The poor intellect takes a lot of blame and heat from PT therapists and leaves fans thinking the intellect is a bad thing in general. This does not set well with Apollo, as I am sure you are all aware of. We just need to get that blame thing right, ya know. My 2 cents for what its worth. Or you can get the fly swatter out and see if you can nail me buzzing around. Others have. In fact, it’s a popular sport now. But I enjoy the challenge. I am still flying for the present.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Apollo: It is not us who gives the cortex a bad rap; it is those who do not understand that cortical connection is the most important part of the process. Otherwise you have pure abreaction. art

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Bruce ,I never ever read a more lucid description of all the people practicing TM
    I had to meet and endure in my life!! Yours emanuel

    ReplyDelete
  7. > "Others may smile beatifically, but exude an aura of passive aggression under the peaceful exterior."

    Man, true dat!

    I've watched meditating dudes intentionally sit in public places with closed eyes. Some have chanted, too. They often have faux-blissed-out smiles that radiate: "Look at me all you unfeeling, insensitive swine! I'm enlightened and evolved...and you're not."

    > "Without attention to feelings, mindfulness meditation is little more than a virtual lobotomy."

    Yes.

    Reminds me of a documentary on orphans taken into monasteries. The filmmaker thought it cruel that young kids were forced to sit zazen for hours at at time. It echoed how I feel about young boys in America who are given Ritalin to "calm down." Those little guys are going, literally, stir crazy! They need recess to burn off energy and gym classes to unwind.

    At least Dervish dancers whirl about while "meditating."

    I liked Jane Roberts, too, for breaking stereotypes. I never truly bought into her "channeling" Seth, but I definitely grokked her (smoking?) drinking beer while in-trance. Plus she felt dancing was a form of prayer.

    We are MEANT to move and make "joyous noise." Even Primals entail making moves and sounds.

    So why mimic the dead while we're alive? Oh, yes. I forgot:

    "Children should be seen and not heard."

    "Sit still!"

    "Stop being so fidgety."

    "Nap...now!"

    That is, we were taught to act dead/invisible/buried so adults' needs could be met.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The people who are commenting here are silly people. I'd go into it, but there are always going to be silly people. But I may add, they are also superficial and terriably uneducated. Are these comments some vain attempt to sound knowledgable? Their anguish is almost palatable. I pity them. I honestly do. BJF

    ReplyDelete
  9. I don't expect my comments to be published...it was just a brief response. Like, do you think anything is really going to change?? Really??

    ReplyDelete