Thursday, August 11, 2011

Why We Remember for Such a Long Time


You know the brain is one of the rare places in the human system where there is a very small turnover of cells. The blood, bone and muscle cells turn over fairly rapidly so we get new cells every few weeks or months. No so with the brain whose cells last us a lifetime, which is why what happened to us during gestation and infancy has such a long lifespan. Yes, there are a few places, such as the hippocampus, where we get new cells perhaps for a lifetime but that is the exception.

So trauma while we are being carried is imprinted into the very rapidly developing neurons and does its damage forevermore. Those long-lasting imprints are designed for survival; to warn us over and again about how to react in the case of similar adversity or threats later on. Those traumas stimulate the production of stress hormones affecting the nerve cells and change memory and learning. They form the “epigenetic mass” which changes how the genes are expressed. We learn how to react from all that. It is adaptive, not an aberration. That is, deviation, neurosis, in my terms, help survival. The early traumas enhance some parts of memory and help them endure; that is one function of the stress hormones. They change the structure and function of some nerve cells. Think of this as a lesson in evolution and how and why it takes place: Experience produces the kinds of cells that are needed to react to that experience. Experience changes us neuro-biologially. Our whole system changes in order to adapt to life. And when that life is traumatic and loveless we change accordingly; we become neurotic (what I call that change). We deviate physically and emotionally in order to adapt and survive. Neurosis is adaptive, which is why we should not mess with it, our compulsions and obsessions until we understand the basis of it all. It is the feeling centers, such as the hippocampus that seals in those critical early memories and makes them last. One role of the stress hormones is to produce a kind of consolidation of key memories so that they remain in place to guide us and help us adapt, even in neurotic ways. We may do it to feel loved and to survive. This enhanced memory also takes place in the key feeling structure, now well explored, called the amygdala, which seems to swell a bit under the load of feeling.

We may have become intellectual to please parents who needed smart kids so that they would look good. And the kid’s physique suffers and changes in deference to the parents needs. The feeling centers diminish and there is less emotion to call on. The kid now lives in his head. Smart but emotionless. Not good.

12 comments:

  1. Aida said something funny ... "We got the thinking brain to be able to tie our shoes ... we have not seen a crow with shoes.
    Furthermore... said her daughter "it's almost no one who can use his two brain halves and those who can do strange things. Of course... it is of despair she says so.

    Frank

    ReplyDelete
  2. A facebook question:
    "So is it better to open up to your feelings and be overwhelmed by them?"

    ReplyDelete
  3. And my answer: We make sure that you open up slowly and methodically so that you are never overwhelmed. art janov

    ReplyDelete
  4. A facebook comment: "Dear Dr JAnov, I was breastfeeding my daughter untill she was 4 years old and ubtil she wanted to breastfeed...Even now she is 7 if she want to touch my breasts
    and play with them or even pretend to breastfeed I let her, I think that is normal and natural thing to do ...people say that is not appropriate but I listen to my daughter not other people..what do you think ???"

    ReplyDelete
  5. And my answer: I think you're right. AJ

    ReplyDelete
  6. Art, I'm sure you are aware that a decade ago scientists in the UK and Japan had received significant funding to develop artificial external wombs (ectogenesis). they were excited about the possibility of reducing the huge number of babies born with fetal alcohol syndrome, and they were keen to give gay couples a chance to grow a "baby in a box" and mothers with defective wombs could grow perfect babies. the two popular styles were the acrylic womb (favoured for it's inert qualities) and the organic womb which consisted of human cells grown on a womb-shaped scaffold. human embryos eagerly attached themselves to the artificial organic womb but didn't grow normal blood vessels. these experiments seem to have been abandoned. in recent years scientists have discovered a complex biological conversation between mother and fetus which seems to be impossible to replicate artificially.

    now apparently we have evidence of extensive human-animal hybridisation which has been going on for many years, and it has already gone way beyond the boundaries of society's common sense of ethics. we all know about the humanised mice:

    http://www.todayonline.com/Science/EDC110722-0000147/New-rules-needed-for-human-animal-hybridisation

    the humanised mouse experiments are unlocking many mysteries relating to human diseases. this is valuable science. but according to Alex Jones and his whistle-blower friends, we have humanzees in captivity:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanzee

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCFP_Unf6zA&feature=related

    many scientists believe the existence of a chuman or humanzee is not only possible, but probable because of it's scientific importance. chimps and humans are as closely related as horses and donkeys (which are bred to create mules).



    so what does all of this mean? well, regardless of whether it is fact or hype, one thing is for sure....it is POPULAR SCIENCE. it is dark and ugly and freakish. scientists love that stuff. scientists are inhumane children. they don't want to help the human race for humane reasons. that's boring to them. they want to have FUN. Primal Theory could be dark and ugly and freakish and FUN if it is promoted very carefully. we must study the minds of relevant scientists and discover why they are NEVER attracted to Primal Theory.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Art, do you think the shrunken parts of my brain can be restored? or is it more grim than that? the longer i wait, the more irreversible damage will be done?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi Art the last days I wonder why on eart
    my ...brain does remember me.. of so v e r y
    many events ,people`s "word" towards me ,even
    anything unimportant like driving in my car
    decades ago the landscape comes in it`s
    precise details into my mind ...
    Sometimes i.e often I feel quite tired of
    it`s "remembering capcities" !
    To what end am I bombarded by these "trite2
    remembrances...-this is not to say ,that it spares tme the big events!!
    Yours emanuel

    ReplyDelete
  9. Richard: Why shrunken? From what? art

    ReplyDelete
  10. well certainly not because i have been cross-bred with a chimpanzee. i mean if our feeling centres have not been very active for many years, they will diminish. as you say, we will have less emotion to call on. i hope this is not a permanent reduction in emotional capacity.

    ReplyDelete
  11. A facebook comment: "right-brainers have more connections to feelings but the connections are mixed up (neurotic) so the feelings never become a fully conscious experience."

    ReplyDelete
  12. Another facebook comment:
    "what about people who are basically right-brainers? often they're really creative but suffer from all kinds of emotional disturbance. they seem to be more connected to their limbic system. but why do they sometimes get worse after they get older? if you're right-brainer shouldn't you be more able to clear out the deep stuff?"

    ReplyDelete