Monday, August 22, 2011

On Hypnosis (Part 18/20)

Where is Reality?

It is certain that the serotonin/endorphin system will not turn out to be the sole mechanism by which hypnotic dissociation occurs. There is a key central brain inhibitor known as glutamate. But we do know that hypnotic suggestion can catalyze inhibitory or repressive chemical production. The suggestion (or idea) given by the hypnotist is transformed into electrochemical activity that somehow blocks pain. More specifically, the suggestion takes on a meaning on the third or cognitive level of consciousness and is then transformed into electrochemical processes which inhibit perception of physical experience. Think of it! A bit of air in the form of certain sounds (words) breathed out to another produces biochemical changes in her which alter her perceptions and block pain.

The subject in Hilgard's ice water experiment was no longer responding to the reality of the ice water. Instead, she was responding to ideas about it, even when those ideas were in complete contradiction to events actually taking place. This transformation of meaning that occurs in hypnosis is not unlike the transformation of meaning that makes neurosis possible. In both, the perception or meaning of the event is altered on one level of consciousness while its intrinsic meaning is registered accurately on the other levels. This leads to the sixty-four dollar question: WHERE IS REALITY?

If I say to a hypnotic subject, "I'm going to put a hot piece of metal on the back of your hand," and then put a cold quarter on it, and the hand then blisters as if a hot metal were placed there (an effect that has been demonstrated in hypnosis), what is real? The metal, the response, the idea, the suggestion? Is there no objective reality? Objective reality dictates that the psychophysiology responds to a cold quarter. Yet the idea in the mind is that it is a hot one and the physiology follows that idea. Clearly, reality is in the perception; that is, intellectual reality. That reality dictates bodily reactions. This is the true meaning of “psychosomatic.” Here the mind innervates and alters bodily reactions; so if we wonder how it is that a child who obeys his parents absolutely has allergies or asthma we see it encapsulated in the hypnosis experiments. The parental dictates change the immune system of the child, for example.

If I perceive an elevator to be terrifying, even though it clearly isn't, and I'm dizzy, fainting, etc., in plain terror, it is my perception that is real for me. But that perception is based on a history. The newly-perceived reality has an historical basis. There are levels of reality that lay on different levels of consciousness. The hypnotist who pricks you states that you will not hurt, and there is no perception of hurt; yet the blood pressure and heart rate mount. The lower level knows reality on its level. That is why when you are in touch with the lower levels of consciousness you are not so easily fooled, lulled or hypnotized. The physiological processes inform the cortex of what is reality.

What Hitler did in Germany was an effective job of hypnosis. He suggested with emotional force, "You are superior to all other races! You need liebensraum!" (more space and freedom). For those who felt inferior and downtrodden, it was a perfect message. And Hitler got the German people to do almost anything, including killing millions of "inferior" individuals. Even those who realistically did not need any more living space responded to his message. What was inserted into their minds supplanted reality. And they acted exactly as if they had been hypnotized. They could kill without feeling anything because any appreciation of the meaning of their acts had been wiped away. Meanwhile, those who wanted and needed peace, an obvious choice, were known as "defeatists" and were punished. Hitler's control became absolute; the "mesmerized" (dissociated) populace went on fighting and dying for a dying cause that had nothing to do with their everyday lives. Not so different today in Iraq where any talk of a peaceful solution is considered by the administration as defeatest and sending the wrong message to our troops. Jingoism then becomes the only topic admissible.

How did Hitler do it? He tapped into the people's basic needs and into their split consciousness. He capitalized on their already existing dissociation and on the ideas that duty was all, and that how you felt was unimportant. He used their feeling of being a defeated nation to suggest that they were conquerors. He turned reality upside down. In short, he suppressed their Pain just as a hypnotist does, and he infused and inculcated another reality – his. Hitler was so skilled (and his subjects so prepared) that he could do it on a mass level.

This whole notion of the nature of reality is critical to an understanding of psychotherapy, for if we assume that reality is what the patient tells us it us (“I feel wonderful. Therapy has been a great success”)we will be led astray. We have neglected an important internal reality, something that can only be achieved by “talking” to the body; that is, measuring it to see what secrets it holds. It may tell a very different story. So then were is reality? Is it what the patients says it is. In short, the nature of reality splits the field of psychotherapy into those who think it is cognitive and those who think it is cognitive-somatic.

When there is dissociation, either in neurosis or hypnosis, the information takes a detour and the person is unconscious of certain facts or states. One of the structures to help in this detour is the thalamus.

9 comments:

  1. I have felt for years that I am living in a world of people who are "living the dream". They have an IDEA of what life is and is all about, an idea of what is good and bad and right and wrong, and an idea what you should and should not want to do etc, etc.

    And yet there is this feeling of pure bulls*t underneath it at....like they never seriously ask themselves: "what do I want" on a direct level. They are living the dream. Believing in a reality that they have been taught to believe in; a reality never to be tested by their own direct perception of their own direct nature.

    And what does the 'socialisation hypnotist' tap into? I think before anything it's that all-powerful threat of feeling inadequate. Not "having a life" etc. This, I think, is what drives most of us to live up to other peoples expectations, and to the point where we can hardly tell the difference between the need to conform to "the [their] dream" and our own direct will.

    Maybe it's all the same dynamics? If we can be hypnotised to kill then we can certainly be hypnotised to do 'other' today, whether we formally identify the process or not. At least we will do so until we stop ruining young children.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Eye witness testimony is an essential part of law and justice, yet eye witness testimony can be problematic as well. But to say a person does not feel well when they know better, is a bit silly and appears to lack credibility. They do feel better and act and function better. There is no doubt in some cases. They just need to know that another type of pain is still resident inside them. They may be be functional now, but there is lots of room for yet far more improvement.

    Instead of denying that they feel good, which is absurd and you do it all the time, suggest that this is only half the battle. And Half is good. But the other half is vital and then unload PT on them. Let them know there are still “forces” inside them creating havoc and chaos and if those were fixed and resolved, far more improvement would take place. To say they are not well at all is playing word games and semantics. It is the tactic of a deceitful lawyer or scientist, a spin doctor. You are uncompromising in demanding the full total healing and not just half, as if seeking PT were nothing at all. No expense, not moving, no spending 3 to 7 years of feeling therapy, and so on. Do you realize what you ask of people, as if it was all their fault they were not coming to Cali tomorrow.

    Tell it for what it really is. Cleaning the head and adjusting reality is only half the battle. That’s fair and true. There is more that could be done. And leave it at that.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Forgot to say (in the email) that in general I really found this post of yours to be a very satisfying exposé.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Pbef: Usually I feel "I can't get no satisfaction" but at least you do. art

    ReplyDelete
  5. Apollo: AYAYAY You means I have to invent a therapy and then figure out transportation? If someone in India could solve my throat problem I would sell my house and get there tomorrow. I give you the therapy and you need to find a way to get it. I do my job you need to do yours. art

    ReplyDelete
  6. Art: can I ask what kind of pain your throat gives you? It sounds like a torment that you can't ever turn off!

    ReplyDelete
  7. No, you got the therapy, but don't deny that some people do make some progress with mainstream therapists. once in a great while, a therapist does a reasonable job, given their lack of PT knowledge. Its not a failure, but simply leaves a lot more to go. Its a step in the right direction.

    We will see what the future holds. PT is not in the cards right now. My job? I'd do it but some do not like whistle blowers. Can you imagine? I cost the last SOB employee a good $50,000 at least by stiffing me for a $1000 vacation. but the company was delighted with the ruthlessness of my boss so that kept him, despite his poor math and people skills.

    Everyone needs a good criminal in their stalls, right? Its hard to be honest or fight for your rights when you don't really have any. I'll keep working at it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Andrew: Let me finish my stem cell therapy and then I will explain. It ain't good. art

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi Apollo,

    -"No, you got the therapy, but don't deny that some people do make some progress with mainstream therapists. once in a great while, a therapist does a reasonable job, given their lack of PT knowledge. Its not a failure, but simply leaves a lot more to go. Its a step in the right direction"-

    Actually I had a very good therapist who guided me along the way over 5 yrs.
    Then, I found he was in no way equipped / set up to take me any further.
    He appeared to know enough about the theory. . . (he has seen this blog and described it as "too many words", another on of those annoying half truths). Ultimately he seemed to me to be ill equipped in the sense of not having the right sort of long enough session, padded cell clinical conditions etc, nor did he apply the theory in a way that helped me learn about or understand myself, he often got trapped in my story, or rather let me stay in it without steering me with the theory as well. He therefore could not teach me to handle my own rising feelings. I mean I was and still am breaking down and unless I had found out about all this through the blog I would be in a bad situation indeed.

    Fortunately I now know what ab-reaction is in me and I know what my projections are and I know when the real tsunami is coming and I know all sorts of shit that supposedly "I shouldn't" because it's not good to self therapise is it?

    I do have Teddy. Y'know, the furry one who listens and doesn't have weird belief systems. Nor does he charge exorbitant fees and only be available by appointment somewhere inconvenient when you least need him.

    So, to conclude, the problem with your statement is that it is a bit generic and actually lacks the detail of any given individuals' own testimony about their living (I mean re-living) experience.

    Alice Miller was in the same difficult situation when she ran her blog and wrote her books because she could not actually recommend any 'good therapists' in Europe. . . All she could do was discuss her own case (and some startling other case studies and historical personalities). She described her process of disillusionment about her previous work as an analytical therapist and how she broke down and resolved her own issues. . . Much through her Art and painting.

    Ironically in one of Alice Millers' books she refers to Arthur Janov. . . . and that is how I came across this blog.

    You can be forgiven for thinking there is a conspiracy to deceive us because Arts' books do not make it onto Waterstones' psychology bookshelves and his science papers are not taken seriously. I believe that global repression and fear of pain is the cause, few people want to know the truth and are largely unaware of their own pain and repression; it's all "out there" isn't it?

    Paul G.

    ReplyDelete