Friday, September 3, 2010

Still More on Depression


David Laplante and Michael Meaney of McGill University, Canada write the following: "We suspect that high levels of prenatal stress exposure, particularly in early in pregnancy, may negatively affect the brain development of the fetus." ("Stress During Pregnancy Affects General Intellectual and Language Functioning in Human Toddlers." David Laplante, Michael Meaney, et al, Pediatric Research, Vol. 56, No. 3, 2004.) They studied pregnant women during a severe ice storm in Canada in 1998. In this study they note: "Imprinting at birth may predispose individuals to certain patterns of behavior that remain masked throughout most of adult life." K.J.S. Anand and associates state that in a number of suicides by violent means "the significant risk factors were those perinatal events that were likely to cause pain in the newborn." (Page 70.) They also point out the pregnant women who smoked heavily had babies more prone to criminality later on. And mothers, who took drugs while pregnant, had children far more prone to drug use, both serious opiates (morphine) and speed (amphetamine). There are literally hundreds of studies now to bolster the hypothesis about early imprints, how they last, and alter our systems.

This is new material. Some 20 years ago, most of this research had not been thought of. Most clinical studies confirm what we have been saying for almost 40 years. Proof of that is now not in question among scientists. What is in question is the necessity of reliving it all. There is scarcely a psychotherapist among us who believes in the absolute necessity of reliving old events and altering their imprints, yet it is that very process that is curative. Might I say that the only process that is curative is one that deals with history and memory?

When I state that the patient "remembers" his time in the womb, we must keep in mind that memory can be something beyond verbal recall. The body remembers in its lack of oxygen, its lack of freedom to move, both in a physical and anatomical sense, its being strangled on the cord or its sense of being overwhelmed and shut down by anesthesia. Clearly, at the outset there is no intellectual recall but there is a lower brain system that has recorded the experience.

Imprints are usually not in the therapist’s lexicon; if nine months of fetal life is ignored, then there is no choice: rules and more rules, 10 or 12 steps to nirvana, etc. Feelings are the opposite of rules. Rules are one causative factor in depression. The depressive too often grew up with rules and regulations instead of warmth, kindness and caresses. They too often go to a therapy that has rules — known as behavior or cognitive therapy, an attempt to change behavior — that involves rules of conduct. The approach is basically, "Do me." It is unfortunate that in most conventional therapies the patient is "done to." It is what parents did now writ large. The person is the recipient of a variety of manipulations. When we ignore feelings, we need to be "done to." This is what happened to many of us growing up — being ordered around without regard to how we feel. It can be as subtle as never asking a child what she wants for dinner. She learns, however subtly, that her needs and feelings don’t count. We certainly do not want to compound the error.

2 comments:

  1. I once had a re-living experience of a very early childhood event before I knew about Primal Therapy. What I said after that experience was: "if that was a memory, then all my prior memories were not real memories." On reading "The Primal Scream" it suddenly made total sense to me, when you defined it as a "re-living". Now I see memory as a remembrance of an event with some sensations, whereas I now know that a "re-living" is to totally go back into the feeling of that old experience. A whole new and very different experience.

    What I have long tried to understand is why few understand FULLY what you have been stating, long and loud, in your writings. I have reached the conclusion that only those that have had some experience of those things, actually 'comprehend' them ... in any depth. To me that is so sad, for I see no other way to get across to humanity at large about our "neurotic" condition. In short, it is a failure of the use of words. Words are no substitute for an experience.

    For all that, I still try. My two cents worth; is to say that depression (to those who suffer it) is; old old feelings of infancy and early childhood, trying to express themselves; in order to resolve it ... finally. If only depressives knew what their depression was, it might, just might, lead to better understanding and perhaps a chance to re-live and resolve some of it's devastation. It also could help the medical profession to finally come to grips with the problem ... for which, I feel, they are floundering.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Art ,in reading and rereading Your article ,my female cousin`s son comes to my mind .He clearly suffered hypoxia during his birth and her`s ! -she a diabetic- .His right arm is somewhat disabled (like those monsters Stalin, german King Frederik ..) But and now a b i g but this did not prevent him to "function" very properly (girls dating ,profession career...) and to me he is -like his mother and his grandmother completely free of any signs of depression 1 Is he the proverbial exception to the rule or did he inherit their well functioning defense system .by the way -he did inherit his father's athletic phyique -contrary ton mine (204cm .Yours emanuel
    PS. In Brasilia there is a 14 years old girl with 206 cm!!!! With an adorable pretty face and publich attention ...Under 14 years old teenie You might google this girl

    ReplyDelete